|
Meeting Minutes |
||
|
I. Opening Business: |
||
|
A. The
meeting was called to order at 9:43 a.m. and opened with
introductions. |
||
|
II. Ready to Succeed Dialogue with Michigan: Representatives Godchaux and LaForge |
||
|
A.
Representative Godchaux reviewed the state level
organization of the Ready to Succeed Dialogue with Michigan,
and explained the bipartisan, bicameral legislative
Children's Caucus. |
||
|
1. The task force approved both proposals; see appendix A for the text of the resolutions. |
||
|
III. Presentation by Kathy Wilbur, Director, Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services |
||
|
A. Ms.
Wilbur outlined the function of DCIS and the DCIS position
on the Governor's proposed rules changes for child care
centers. |
||
|
V. Discussion with Kathy Wilbur |
||
|
A. Ms.
Wilbur responded to questions from the task force. |
||
|
V. Business of the task force: |
||
|
A. Task
force leadership &emdash; Members of the task force agreed
that Steve Manchester and Erin McGovern will co-chair the
task force for the next twelve months. |
||
|
VI. Closing Business: |
||
|
A. Next
month's meeting will feature Marjorie Kostelnik, Chair of
the MSU department of Family and Child Ecology and a
discussion about the task force's mission and vision. |
||
|
Approval of the Fiduciary for the Ready to Learn Dialogue with Michigan Established under P.A. 135 of 1999, Section 641 Pursuant to P.A. 135 of 1999, section 641, passed by the Michigan Legislature and approved by Governor John Engler, the Michigan Child Care Task Force at its meeting on October 6, 1999, approves, as the fiduciary for the Ready to Learn Leadership Summit established under said statutory section, the Michigan Association for the Education of Young Children (MiAEYC). Furthermore, MiAEYC may receive, as a grant, funds appropriated under section 641 for purposes of implementing the section. Approval by the Michigan Child Care Task Force for MiAEYC to serve as fiduciary for the Ready to Learn Leadership Summit and to receive a grant of the funds appropriated under section 641 shall take effect only if the planning committee established under that section also approves the same. This motion was passed by the Michigan Child Care Task Force on Wednesday, October 6, 1999. ________________________ Recording Secretary for the Meeting ________________________ State Representative Patricia Godchaux ________________________ State Representative Ed LaForge
Formation of the Ready to Learn Dialogue with Michigan Planning Committee Established under P.A. 135 of 1999, Section 641 Pursuant to P.A. 135 of 1999, section 641, passed by the Michigan Legislature and approved by Governor John Engler, the Michigan Child Care Task Force at its meeting on October 6, 1999, appoints the planning committee established under said statutory section as follows: It shall be comprised of a representative from the four organizations that compose the Child Care Task Force Planning Group, which are the Michigan 4C Association, the Michigan Association for the Education of Young Children, the Michigan Head Start Association and Michigan's Children. This planning committee shall merge its work and the money allocated for the Ready to Learn Dialogue with Michigan with the Ready to Succeed Dialogue with Michigan project proposed by Representatives Patricia Godchaux and Ed LaForge at the Michigan Child Care Task Force meeting of October 6, 1999. In carrying out this merger, the planning committee shall assure that obligations set out in subsections (3) and (5) of PA 135 of 1999, section 641, are met. The planning committee shall report on these matters to the Michigan Child Care Task Force at least once every three months beginning no later than December, 1999. This motion was passed by the Michigan Child Care Task Force on Wednesday, October 6, 1999. ________________________ Recording Secretary for the Meeting ________________________ State Representative Patricia Godchaux ________________________ State Representative Ed LaForge |
||
|
MCCTF Minutes Appendix B: Review of presentation by Kathy Wilbur, Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services Director |
||
|
DCIS regulates all licensure except fishing and drivers' licenses DCIS views rules as one part of the entire process that is a regulatory system Of the human services DCIS regulates, child care is the largest sector Child care is the sector with the fewest "major problems," i.e. revocation or suspension of license: .5 of 1% of these problems are from child care DCIS regulates 21,000 licensed providers and 4,760 licensed centers, which provide 350,000 spaces for children. 229,389 of those spaces are in child care centers. Rules governing the licensure of child care centers are a result of Public Act 116 of 1973, and were designed to carry out "legislative intent" DCIS feels that "rules provide consistency and lessen subjectivity" DCIS is required to review the rules every five years DCIS feels that the proposed rules: |
||
|
Increase fire safety
standards, |
||
|
The proposed rules are draft, and DCIS will incorporate changes generated through public testimony The DCIS process for implementing new rules: |
||
|
Open process |
||
|
To contact DCIS: |
||
|
Director's Office:
517.373.7230 |
||
|
Michigan Child Care Task Force, October 6 1999 Appendix C: Review of Discussion with Kathy Wilbur Michigan Department of Consumer and Industry Services Director |
||
|
MCCTF members voiced the following concerns about the proposed rules: |
||
|
Special education programs are excluded and should be included. Prescriptive language is missing from proposed rules. Health and safety of children is at risk--ask any health care professional. What qualifications will the licensing consultant who reviews each individual center's plan have? How will DCIS assure that the consultants have ample time and resources to review the plans? Rules should be clear and enforceable, otherwise there is a high cost to the state and business owners. Will there be liability insurance or protection for providers? Must consider short vs. long term outcomes; this plan may look good on paper but it is logistically flawed. This system will be costly and harmful to providers. If noncompliance is low and provider complaints are not related to licensing paperwork, why overhaul the rules? |
||
|
|
|